外逃通緝犯查詢系統

  • 吳建輝 照片/WU CHIEN HUI photo
  • 中文姓名
    吳建輝
  • 英文姓名
    WU CHIEN HUI
  • 出生年月日
    1969/**/**
  • 身分證統一編號
    H12042****
  • 護照號碼
    307137***
  • 可能潛逃時間
    2018年12月
  • 可能潛逃地點
    中國大陸 P.R.C(China)in December 2018
  • 通緝機關
    臺灣桃園地方檢察署 Taiwan Taoyuan District Prosecutors Office
  • 通緝時間
    2020/11/4
  • 通緝罪名
    詐欺等案 Fraud and related
  • 涉嫌事實
    吳建輝明知壹維幣非合法虛擬貨幣,且「分分通」亦不具有行動支付及投資理財功能,意圖為自己不法之所有,機局詐欺取財之犯意,於民國102年10月間以不實投資資訊使被害人信以為真投資壹維幣。又吳建輝為上海勃同網絡科技股份有限公司實際負責人,明知公司營運狀況不佳,基於行使業務登載不實文書之犯意,在營業計劃書上填載不實內容,損害財團法人資訊工業策進會對於創櫃板推薦企業審查之正確性。 Defendant Chien-Hui Wu was fully aware that evcoin is not a legal virtual currency and that the "Fen Fen Tong" app/program FF-Expert service platform does not have mobile payment, investment, or financial management functions, but the Defendant nonetheless formed the criminal intent to obtain illegal gains through fraud. In October 2013, the Defendant claimed to be the CEO of an evcoin exchange as well as the CEO of an evcoin Trading Alliance private club, and posted false information in the evcoin investment related LINE group and Weibo page claiming that the price of evcoin has risen sharply, and the total transaction volume has reached RMB100 million. The Defendant also made false claims to Complainants Wen-Xian Huang, Fu-Hui Huang, Kun-Cheng Lin, Wan-Zhen Wu, and Pei-Ti Lai as well as Victims You-Hong Chang, Jia-Qing Lin, Ming-Fu Wang, and Xiu-Rong Huang that evcoin is similar to the virtual currency Bitcoin, that it is a new and legal virtual currency, and that buying at a bargain price now and selling at high prices in the future would result in profits. As a result, the 5 Complainants and 4 Victims believed the false claims, and paid cash to the Defendant or remitted funds to the Cathay United Bank account no. 022506224423 held by Co-Defendant Chia-Chen Liao (not prosecuted) in the amounts specified in the attached table in order to invest in evcoin. The fraud scheme allowed them to obtain a total of NT$24,645,860. The Defendant was also the actual responsible person of Shanghai Botong Network Technology Co., Ltd. (hereafter "Shanghai Botong") who must undertake business operations in accordance with the law. However, while knowing that Shanghai Botong's operating conditions were sluggish with the total operating income of just NT$1.5 million in 2016, the Defendant formed the criminal intent and published false documents while engaging in business, and falsely claimed that Shanghai Botong had current assets of NT$6,681,500, total shareholders' equity of NT$7,681,500, operating income of NT$20,000,000, and current net profit of NT$6,681,500 in Shanghai Botong's 2016 company business plan. In November 2016, the Defendant also applied for the GISA recommendation from the Institute for Information Industry using said false information, which was sufficient to impair the correctness of GISA's recommendation review. The Defendant is alleged to have committed unlawful control over other's property or obtained illegal benefit under Paragraph 1, Article 339 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of China as well as forgery in the course of his occupation under Articles 215 and 216 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of China.